<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once upon a time in Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html</link>
	<description>Portugal - World Cup 2010 - South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:25:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mexico x France review - FIFA World Cup 2006 - Portugal World Cup Team Blog</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Mexico x France review - FIFA World Cup 2006 - Portugal World Cup Team Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>[...] Mexico showed us what I pretty much said on my analyses one month ago: they are a very well organized team but they lack individual talent. The Mexicans fills the field’s spaces when defending and pass the ball a lot when attacking. However, there isn’t anybody capable of giving Borgetti or Franco the opportunity to score. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mexico showed us what I pretty much said on my analyses one month ago: they are a very well organized team but they lack individual talent. The Mexicans fills the field’s spaces when defending and pass the ball a lot when attacking. However, there isn’t anybody capable of giving Borgetti or Franco the opportunity to score. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro P</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I agree with what Luis says about Pauleta. I mean, Pauleta is arguably one of the best strikers currently. Not one of the top 10 in the world. He&#039;s also not the type of striker that people are used to see. The type like Ronaldo, Batistuta, any italian or any english, etc... The guy who picks the ball, typically not very skilled but runs faster and puts in in at first shot. 

Look at Portugal... How many teams create so many, so good, so brilliant and technically difficult goal scoring oppurtunities? And scores so little when compared to it? Most teams struggle to create those chances but when in one, the striker does it. With this I also mean that, I sorry to those who disagree and feel I exagerate, Portugal is for me by far the team with the best service. Even better than Brazil. There&#039;s no midfield in the world that creates so much top level assistances as Portugal.

About 2 stikers: Scolari did try it, as well as the 3-5-2; or 3-3-4 - would make sense as the midfield has always been our strength, we know have top defenders in all 4 positions and 2 strikers are usefull, in the sense that one drags the defenders and the other has more freedom. Players never really got used to it. The team also clearly performed better with 2 musculated midfielders rather than with one more defensive and another attacking. Thank god Maniche can attack very good and Deco can defend and contain quite good as well. There&#039;s nothing strange about this. The team that has such a system and plays in a style almost like ours is The Netherlands. France wasn&#039;t so different neither. The fact that we usually beat them (NL) shows my point above - strikers importance is diminished and POR has a better service. Is Ruud van Nistelroy better than Pauleta? He&#039;s surelly stronger - he also plays in England, a rather physicall league.

About Simao, Moutinho and Boa Morte: Simao is at a different level than Boa Morte as far as technique is concerned. He is much better. He is also extremelly good at free kicks. However, as a team member, Boa Morte gives robustness, is more goal oriented and goes for scoring more frequently. This makes him, dependind on the adversary, a better piece overall. 

Moutinho is neither a winger nor a striker. Simao and Boa Morte are somewhere in between. Moutinho, althoguh very young, is already a world class top central midfielder. You can&#039;t make a brilliant team with guys just like him but no team is brilliant without one like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what Luis says about Pauleta. I mean, Pauleta is arguably one of the best strikers currently. Not one of the top 10 in the world. He&#8217;s also not the type of striker that people are used to see. The type like Ronaldo, Batistuta, any italian or any english, etc&#8230; The guy who picks the ball, typically not very skilled but runs faster and puts in in at first shot. </p>
<p>Look at Portugal&#8230; How many teams create so many, so good, so brilliant and technically difficult goal scoring oppurtunities? And scores so little when compared to it? Most teams struggle to create those chances but when in one, the striker does it. With this I also mean that, I sorry to those who disagree and feel I exagerate, Portugal is for me by far the team with the best service. Even better than Brazil. There&#8217;s no midfield in the world that creates so much top level assistances as Portugal.</p>
<p>About 2 stikers: Scolari did try it, as well as the 3-5-2; or 3-3-4 &#8211; would make sense as the midfield has always been our strength, we know have top defenders in all 4 positions and 2 strikers are usefull, in the sense that one drags the defenders and the other has more freedom. Players never really got used to it. The team also clearly performed better with 2 musculated midfielders rather than with one more defensive and another attacking. Thank god Maniche can attack very good and Deco can defend and contain quite good as well. There&#8217;s nothing strange about this. The team that has such a system and plays in a style almost like ours is The Netherlands. France wasn&#8217;t so different neither. The fact that we usually beat them (NL) shows my point above &#8211; strikers importance is diminished and POR has a better service. Is Ruud van Nistelroy better than Pauleta? He&#8217;s surelly stronger &#8211; he also plays in England, a rather physicall league.</p>
<p>About Simao, Moutinho and Boa Morte: Simao is at a different level than Boa Morte as far as technique is concerned. He is much better. He is also extremelly good at free kicks. However, as a team member, Boa Morte gives robustness, is more goal oriented and goes for scoring more frequently. This makes him, dependind on the adversary, a better piece overall. </p>
<p>Moutinho is neither a winger nor a striker. Simao and Boa Morte are somewhere in between. Moutinho, althoguh very young, is already a world class top central midfielder. You can&#8217;t make a brilliant team with guys just like him but no team is brilliant without one like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mexico in theeyes of Portugal - FIFA World Cup 2006 - Iran World Cup Team Blog</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Mexico in theeyes of Portugal - FIFA World Cup 2006 - Iran World Cup Team Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-353</guid>
		<description>[...]   You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.        Leave aReply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.        Leave aReply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with Luis Paulo on his last comment.  I think Pauleta is good enough.  While he certainly is not a strong straight-ahead striker (The type BR fans seem to love), like Ronaldo, he does have his own desirable qualities.  His timing, technique, and intellect make him a key asset on the pitch for any team.  The downside to this kind of striker is that you have to build the entire team around him.  Instead of being a spear, he is merely the tip of the spear.  Today&#039;s &quot;Portuguese Football&quot; is primarily a game of timing passes.  We don&#039;t need Pauleta to be a presence in the game until that last pass and then bing! It&#039;s in back of the net before the defense knows what&#039;s going on.  It makes for a nice looking style of play, but it obviously has its downside when PT has its rhythm disrupted by a highly organized defensive team.  EC04 nightmares…

Having said all that, I do agree that Pauleta has a tough time in tourneys because he doesn&#039;t have the same physical stature as today&#039;s top defenders, but again, he doesn’t have to brawl with them.  He just has to be quicker and smarter with a lethal finish.

As for A), well, he certainly gets good enough service so I don&#039;t think we can blame the midfield.

I think Ceasar is right on C).  That’s why Scolari has tried, time after time, to introduce a 2 striker system.  It just doesn&#039;t seem to work for PT.  It&#039;s also why Scolari is always screaming at C. Ronaldo to play a more central attacking role with Pauleta.  With C. Ronaldo terrorizing the defense, Pauleta can exploit the spaces and pick up any garbage.

PT has some obvious chinks in their armor.  But, I’m counting on two factors that will hopefully help them be successful in this WC: The first is Scolari’s ability to use tactics to make up for weaknesses.  And the second is the level of motivation and desire to win on the part of our players and our people as a whole.  The struggle to win a WC runs deep in our national soul.  After EC04, Portugal is hungry for this World Cup and that might just turn out to be the most important thing in our favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with Luis Paulo on his last comment.  I think Pauleta is good enough.  While he certainly is not a strong straight-ahead striker (The type BR fans seem to love), like Ronaldo, he does have his own desirable qualities.  His timing, technique, and intellect make him a key asset on the pitch for any team.  The downside to this kind of striker is that you have to build the entire team around him.  Instead of being a spear, he is merely the tip of the spear.  Today&#8217;s &#8220;Portuguese Football&#8221; is primarily a game of timing passes.  We don&#8217;t need Pauleta to be a presence in the game until that last pass and then bing! It&#8217;s in back of the net before the defense knows what&#8217;s going on.  It makes for a nice looking style of play, but it obviously has its downside when PT has its rhythm disrupted by a highly organized defensive team.  EC04 nightmares…</p>
<p>Having said all that, I do agree that Pauleta has a tough time in tourneys because he doesn&#8217;t have the same physical stature as today&#8217;s top defenders, but again, he doesn’t have to brawl with them.  He just has to be quicker and smarter with a lethal finish.</p>
<p>As for A), well, he certainly gets good enough service so I don&#8217;t think we can blame the midfield.</p>
<p>I think Ceasar is right on C).  That’s why Scolari has tried, time after time, to introduce a 2 striker system.  It just doesn&#8217;t seem to work for PT.  It&#8217;s also why Scolari is always screaming at C. Ronaldo to play a more central attacking role with Pauleta.  With C. Ronaldo terrorizing the defense, Pauleta can exploit the spaces and pick up any garbage.</p>
<p>PT has some obvious chinks in their armor.  But, I’m counting on two factors that will hopefully help them be successful in this WC: The first is Scolari’s ability to use tactics to make up for weaknesses.  And the second is the level of motivation and desire to win on the part of our players and our people as a whole.  The struggle to win a WC runs deep in our national soul.  After EC04, Portugal is hungry for this World Cup and that might just turn out to be the most important thing in our favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Paulo</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-351</guid>
		<description>I would say none of the above.

He is just no good enough. The French football is not at the same level as the Italian, spanish or british. When he faces the best defenders in the world, he just don&#039;t have the skill to perform as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say none of the above.</p>
<p>He is just no good enough. The French football is not at the same level as the Italian, spanish or british. When he faces the best defenders in the world, he just don&#8217;t have the skill to perform as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceasar Lourenco</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceasar Lourenco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Luis, Simao isn&#039;t as good as Boa Morte (who&#039;s in fine form right now) and Moutinho. Even though I am a fan of Simao.
Answer me this guys..
Is Pauleta&#039;s lack of scoring in the really big games because of:

A) Not getting the right service from the midfield.
B) He&#039;s just not able to handle the bigger and better defenders he meets at the WC or EC.
C) The one striker system makes it&#039;s easier to man mark him.
D) Combination of the above.
E) Non of the above - Other!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Luis, Simao isn&#8217;t as good as Boa Morte (who&#8217;s in fine form right now) and Moutinho. Even though I am a fan of Simao.<br />
Answer me this guys..<br />
Is Pauleta&#8217;s lack of scoring in the really big games because of:</p>
<p>A) Not getting the right service from the midfield.<br />
B) He&#8217;s just not able to handle the bigger and better defenders he meets at the WC or EC.<br />
C) The one striker system makes it&#8217;s easier to man mark him.<br />
D) Combination of the above.<br />
E) Non of the above &#8211; Other!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Paulo</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Nelson, I also believe that Simão is not in a as good moment as Luis Boa Morte or even João Moutinho. But that&#039;s only me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson, I also believe that Simão is not in a as good moment as Luis Boa Morte or even João Moutinho. But that&#8217;s only me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Paulo</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Nelson, is this some kind of interview. You can give me your e-mail just by writing it on the e-mail box on your next comment and we can discuss in portuguese there since we&#039;re both brazilian.

About the offense. I don&#039;t think Simão will have a chance with Felipão. Has last game for the NT was against Letonia.  He will probably just call Postiga, Pauleta and Nuno Gomes for the attack. Quaresma in the other hand might get a chance. He was not called for the u-21 team which will be playing the European Cup at the same time as the WC so that could indicate he has a chance. 

Portugal is a very offensive time although its miss an outstanding striker. Therefore Scolari will play with only Pauleta. Cristiano Ronaldo will play as a winger. Figo, C. Ronaldo and Deco made one of the best offensive midfield in the World but they lack replacements. Quaresma, Moutinho or even Tiago can&#039;t do the same job as well as them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson, is this some kind of interview. You can give me your e-mail just by writing it on the e-mail box on your next comment and we can discuss in portuguese there since we&#8217;re both brazilian.</p>
<p>About the offense. I don&#8217;t think Simão will have a chance with Felipão. Has last game for the NT was against Letonia.  He will probably just call Postiga, Pauleta and Nuno Gomes for the attack. Quaresma in the other hand might get a chance. He was not called for the u-21 team which will be playing the European Cup at the same time as the WC so that could indicate he has a chance. </p>
<p>Portugal is a very offensive time although its miss an outstanding striker. Therefore Scolari will play with only Pauleta. Cristiano Ronaldo will play as a winger. Figo, C. Ronaldo and Deco made one of the best offensive midfield in the World but they lack replacements. Quaresma, Moutinho or even Tiago can&#8217;t do the same job as well as them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Luis Paulo,

We wrote a lot about the defense of the team. What about the organisation of the offensive part ?
I mean : do you think Felipão will select Simão Sabrosa (I hope not), do you think he select Quaresma ? etc... I would like to have your comments about the offensive aspects of the team. Thank you.

Nelson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis Paulo,</p>
<p>We wrote a lot about the defense of the team. What about the organisation of the offensive part ?<br />
I mean : do you think Felipão will select Simão Sabrosa (I hope not), do you think he select Quaresma ? etc&#8230; I would like to have your comments about the offensive aspects of the team. Thank you.</p>
<p>Nelson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/euro-2008/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html/comment-page-1#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portugal.worldcupblog.org/group-d/once-upon-a-time-in-mexico.html#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Mexico may or may not have deserved to get a seed in this world cup.  Truth be told, it probably should have gone to the dutch.  FIFA looks at many aspects when it comes to seeding, and one that cannot be overlooked are sets of eyes watching the telly.  
Mexico is the 2nd largest TV market in the Americas for the world cup, and it suits FIFA to have them around as long as possible.  It certainly didn&#039;t hurt that Mexico performed well at the last confed cup as well as their group performances in their last 3 world cups. Was it merited, probably not.  Can it be justified, you betcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexico may or may not have deserved to get a seed in this world cup.  Truth be told, it probably should have gone to the dutch.  FIFA looks at many aspects when it comes to seeding, and one that cannot be overlooked are sets of eyes watching the telly.<br />
Mexico is the 2nd largest TV market in the Americas for the world cup, and it suits FIFA to have them around as long as possible.  It certainly didn&#8217;t hurt that Mexico performed well at the last confed cup as well as their group performances in their last 3 world cups. Was it merited, probably not.  Can it be justified, you betcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
